Updated: 2st July 2009 with Media Release and List of signatories
As you might be aware, the ten-month period that the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) had given itself to vet public comments received on the Draft Coastal Management Zone (CMZ) 2008 Notification comes to an end in June. This Draft, based on the recommendations of the much-criticized Swaminathan Committee Report, was an attempt to dismantle existing coastal regulation and open up coastal regions for fast-paced, destructive economic development. It was opposed not only by coastal communities, environmental groups, women’s organizations, trade unions, NGOs but also by several coastal state governments. The most recent caution against introducing such a coastal management regime came in March 2009 from a high-powered Parliamentary Standing Committee. The Minister, Jairam Ramesh has announced that on July 16 a fresh ‘hybrid’ rule will be issued that will combine existing rules with the recommendations of the Swaminathan Committee Report. A statement to this effect is given below which we urge you to endorse. Send your Organisational endorsements to peter.ksmtf@gmail.com within 20th June
Save the Coasts!! Oppose backdoor changes to coastal regulation norms!
We, the undersigned, strongly oppose the planned move of the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), as recently reported in the press, to introduce by July 16, a new, ‘hybrid’ set of coastal regulatory rules which will combine existing regulation and new rules based on the recommendations of the Swaminathan Committee. This is completely unacceptable and we are outraged by what appears to be a brazen attempt by the MoEF to introduce through the backdoor, pro-industry and anti-people coastal reforms that are being bitterly opposed by fishing and other coastal communities, environmental organizations, women’s organizations, trade unions and NGOs.
The report of the Swaminathan Committee had recommended that existing coastal regulation be dismantled and the coasts opened up to allow a wide range of economic activities; that ‘no-development zone’ restrictions be lifted in sensitive core areas and that the coastal zone be extended up to 12 nautical miles into the sea to make way for Notified Tourism Areas, Special Economic Zones, mining projects, industrial estates, power plants, ports and harbours. The report was rejected by the people who saw it as facilitating the illegal takeover of coastal land from the poor. It was an attempt to clear the path for unchecked coastal commercialization that did not hesitate to put 10 million fisher people in harm’s way; to destroy fragile and life-sustaining coastal ecosystems, and to significantly increase the potential for global warming and climate change through opening up coastal land for grabs.
The irresponsible and scheming recommendations subsequently formed the basis of a Draft Coastal Management Zone (CMZ) 2008 Notification to which objections were invited in May 2008. Several coastal state governments opposed the draft. It was opposed by fishing communities, environmental organizations, women’s organizations, trade unions and NGOs in every coastal state. The recent report submitted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science, Technology, Environment and Forests clearly recommends that the CMZ 2008 Notification be kept in abeyance. The Parliamentary Panel criticized the Government’s attempt to bring new coastal legislation through an undemocratic and non-participatory process. It has urged the Government to ensure the “inclusion and integration of coastal communities through participative, decision making and control instruments”.
The MoEF statement however indicates that while the CMZ 2008 Notification will be kept pending, the existing 1991 Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification to be issued on July 16 will now include the highly objectionable Swaminathan Committee recommendations. This is nothing but bringing the CMZ Notification through the backdoor! Was the public engagement on the issue no more than mere eyewash to manage dissent? We strongly condemn this underhand move of the newly formed UPA Government!
Reworking coastal rules to accommodate neo-liberal policies will endanger both the coasts and the lives of 250 million coastal dwellers, including 10 million fisher people. Fisher women, whose main activities are shoreline-based, are already suffering due to violations of existing norms which have allowed exploitative economic activities, like mining, tourism and hazardous industries to mushroom in coastal areas. Fisher women are aware that if coastal policy is amended to legitimize full-scale liberalization, they will have to bear the brunt of the resulting livelihood insecurity, coastal erosion, unavailability of basic services, cultural disintegration as well as increased sexual exploitation.
No change to coastal legislation can take place without proper consultations with fishing populations, including women; complete consensus from all coastal states; proper parliamentary discussion and national debate. We therefore reiterate that the only way forward is to:
1. Scrap any moves towards introducing the CMZ 2008 Notification
2. Reject the Swaminathan Committee report recommendations
3. Implement the 1991 CRZ Notification in its original form
4. Immediately identify and punish violations of the original 1991 CRZ Notification
5. Immediately recognize and uphold the traditional and customary rights of fisher people to housing, coastal lands as well as sea and marine resources.
Endorsed by
- Aastha Sansthan, Udaipur
- Adishakti Lokbikash Sangthan, Patrapur, Gajpati, Orissa
- Adivasi Adhikar Abhijan Mayurbhanj, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
- Adivasi Banvasi Kalyan Samiti, Sonbhadra
- Adivasi Bikash Parisad, Kaptipada, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
- Adivasi Chetona Manch, Kalahandi, Orissa
- Adivasi Dalit Adhikar Abhijan Manch, Pallahara, Anugul, Orissa
- Adivasi Jan Van Adhikar Manch, Chattisgarh
- Adivasi Solidarity Council (South India), Tamil Nadu
- Adiwasi Samta Manch Kankwe-East, Bastar
- Alter Media, Trichur
- Anchalik Bikash Parisad, Anugul, Orissa
- Anchalik Jungle Surakshya Sangthan, Rasgovindpur, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
- Anchalika Adivasi Unnayan Parishad, Hindol, Dhenkanal, Orissa
- Ancholia Unnayan Parishad, Phiringia, Kandhamal, Orissa
- Ancholiko Unnayan Sangh, Dasmonthpur, Koraput, Orissa
- Ancholiko Vikas Parisad, Pottangi, Koraput, Orissa
- ANHAD ( Act Now for Harmony and Democracy), New Delhi
- Anthra, Hyderabad and Pune
- Antyodaya Chetana Mandal (ACM), Orissa
- Apda Nivarak Manch Jalaun
- B.K.S. Moodigeri Karnataka
- Bada Emam Bada, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh
- Badlav Sansthan, Udaipur
- BAGHICHA
- Balmianni Kutomi, Umarkote, Nawarangpur, Orissa
- Basel Mission Christian Association, Bangalore,
- Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Purush Sangharsh Morcha, Bhopal
- Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Stationery Karmchari Sangh, Bhopal
- Bhopal Group for Information & Action
- binayaksen.net
- Breakthrough Appropriate Technology Transfer Network (BATNET), Orissa
- Budakattu Krishikara Sangha (B.K.S.) Karnataka
- Center for Social Initiatives, Gorakhpur
- Centre for Education and Documentation
- Centre for Organisation Research & Education (CORE), Imphal, Manipur
- Centre for Research on New International Economic Order (CReNIEO), Tamilnadu and Orissa
- Chetana Sansthan, Rajgarh,Alwar
- CIEDS Collective, Bengaluru
- Coastal community development society
- Coastal development Forum- Alappuzha
- Coastal Women’s Movement
- Community Environmental Monitoring, Chennai
- Coorg Organisation For Rural Development (CORD)
- Corporate Accountability Desk of The Other Media, Chennai
- Council of Professional Social Workers (CPSW), Orissa
- Dabco, Madhya Pradesh
- DEED, Hunsur
- Delhi Forum
- Deo-mali Mahila Sangh, Semiliguda, Koraput, Orissa
- Dialogue from the Other End, Chattisgarh
- Disha Samaj Sevi Sanstha, Chattisgarh
- East Coast Research and Development, Thoothukudi, Tamil nadu
- Electro – Homeopathy Medical Association of India, Allahabad
- Environment Support Group, Bangalore
- Equations, Bangalore
- Focus on Global South, India
- Forum Against Oppression of Women, Mumbai.
- Forum Kerala
- Foundation for Nature Exploration and Environmental Conservation, Bangalore
- Free Binayak Sen Campaign
- FRIENDS, Varanasi
- Gana Chetana Sangthan, Rasgovindpur, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
- Ganglamaa Vikash Manch, Korkunda, Malkangiri, Orissa
- Gas Peedit Mahila Purush Sangharsh
- Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Andolan(Mumbai)
- Gram Sahajog, Kalahandi, Orissa
- Gram Vikas (GV), Orissa
- Gramanchal Bikash Parisad, Anugul, Keonjhar, Orissa
- Green Alternatives
- Greenpeace India
- Greenpeace, India
- Himal Watch, Uttarakhand
- Ho Munda Bhasa Bikash Manch, Kaptipada, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
- IDSL, Begumganj, Madhya Pradesh
- Indian Social Action Forum – INSAF, Delhi
- Indian Social Institute, New Delhi
- INSAF, New Delhi
- Integrated Rural Development of Weaker Sections in India (IRDWSI), Orissa
- Intercultural Resources, Delhi
- International Collective for the support of Fishworkers, Chennai
- International Institute of Art, Culture & Democracy, Bangalore
- Jagran Jan vikas , Udaipur, Rajasthan.
- Jahar Surkshya Manch, Rasgovindpur, Kaptipada, Orissa
- JAN CHETANA, Raigarh, Chhathisgarh
- Jenamunnettom-Kerala
- Jharkhnd Jengal Bechavo Antholan
- Jungle Jivan Surakshya Parisad, Umarkote, Nawarangpur, Orissa
- KABANI The Other Direction, Kerala
- Kalpavriksh
- Kancheepuram District Fisher People Rights Movement
- Karnataka Social Forum, Bangaluru
- Kasti Dakua Adivasi Mohasangha, Nuagaon, Nayagarh, Orissa
- Kenneth Anderson Nature Society
- Kerala Swatantra Malsya Thozhilaly Federation (KSMTF)
- Kerala Theeradesa Mahilavedi
- Kerala Tourism Watch
- Keraleeyam Magazine, Trichur
- Kheti Virasat Mission, Punjab.
- Kindernothilfe, Bangalore
- Kisan Morcha, Bikaner
- Kuvi Kulomi, Semiliguda, Koraput, Orissa
- LABIA/ Stree Sangam, Mumbai
- Loko Unnayan Sangh (LUS), Semiliguda, Koraput, Orissa
- Madhuban Sewa Samiti, Fatehpur
- Madurai Multipurpose Social Service Society, Madurai
- Mahendragiri Adivasi Adhikar Samiti, Rayagada, Gajpati, Orissa
- Mahila Evam Bal Kalyan Sewa Samiti, Deoria
- Malabar Theeradesa Mahila Federation
- Malaygiri Bikash Manch, Anugul, Keonjhar, , Orissa
- Malwarmir, Indore
- Maru Women SHG federation, Bikaner
- Meenava Viduthalai Vengaiakal
- Mewat Community Foundation, Alwar
- Mewat Vikas Shiksha Samiti, Rajasthan
- MMSVS, Alwar
- Moving Republic, Bangalore
- Mukti Sanghthan, Dhenkanal, Orissa
- Munigiri Gana Sangthan, Rayagada, Gajpati, Orissa
- Nagarik Mancha, West Bengal
- Nagrik Kalyan Samity, Jharkhnd
- Nari Bikash-Women Organisation, Lanjigarh, Kalahandi, Orissa
- Narmada Bachao Andolan
- National Adivasi Alliance
- National Campaign for Dalit Human Rights
- National Coastal Women’s Movement
- National Forum of Forest People and Forest Workers
- National Society of Friends of the Trees, Pune
- National Union of Fishermen
- New Socialist Alternative
- New Trade Union Initiative
- Niyamgiri Surkshya Manch, Kalahandi, Orissa
- Odisha Adivasi Adhikar Abhijan, Orissa
- Open Space & SUPPORT, Bangalore
- Openspace, Bangalore
- PAD Vambar Tamilnadu
- Pahadi Sangrami Manch, Kandhamal, Orissa
- Paryavaran Mitra, Ahmedabad
- Pathabhedam Magazine, Calicut
- PEACE, New Delhi
- People’s Rural Education Movement (PREM), Orissa
- People’s Institute for Participatory Action Research (PIPAR), Orissa
- Peoples Movement against Nuclear Energy, Tamil nadu
- Pondichery State Fishworkers forum
- Praktik Paryavaran Sarvardhan Samiti, Jaipur
- Presentation Sisters Lismore, Australia
- Project level committee, Rayagada, Gajpati, Orissa
- PUCL, Balia
- Regional Centre for Development Cooperation (RCDC), Orissa
- RIGHTS Kerala
- River Basin Friends, Assam
- Rural Action for Development (RAD), Orissa
- Rusimal Anchalik Unnayan Parishad, Daringbadi, Kondhmal, Orissa
- Sahaya, Kandhamal, Orissa
- Saheli, New Delhi
- SAIACS, CED Centre, Bangalore
- Sajukodi Dhorti Surkhya Porisod, Semiliguda, Koraput, , Orissa
- Samajika Parivartana Vikas Kendra (SPVK), Orissa
- Samajika Vikas Kendram (SVK), Orissa
- Samruddhi Kanakapura Karnataka.
- Samudayik Vikas Sansthan, Barabanki
- Sanmathi, Bangalore
- Sarvangeen Gramin Vikas Prashikshan Samiti, Mubarakpur, Gazipur
- Saura Adivasi Ahikar Abhijan, Nuagada, Gajpati, Orissa
- Seba Jagat Orissa
- SEBAJAGAT (Orissa)
- Seva Bharati (SB), Orissa
- Shakti Sangthan (The women member’s organisation), Dhenkanal, Orissa
- Shremasakthi Job Training &Research Centre, Trivandrum
- Social Action Group for Achievement of Right (SAGAR), Jaunpur
- Social Scientist, Hyderabad
- Social Work Department, St. Joseph’s College, Bangalore
- Society for Leprosy Amelioration and Rehabilitation (SOLAR), Orissa
- Socio-Economic Development Programme (SEDP), Orissa and WB
- Solidarity Youth Movement- Kerala
- South Asian Dialogues on Ecological Democracy ( SADED)
- South Indian Cell for Human Rights Education & Monitoring (SICHREM)
- South India Fisher People Welfare Society
- Tagore Society for Rural Development (TSRD), Orissa and WB
- Tamilnadu Coastal Protection Movement
- Tamil Nadu Environment Council (TNEC)
- Tamilnadu Fisher People Development Society
- Tamilnadu Pondy Fisher people Federation
- TEED Trust Yellapur Karnataka
- Third Eye Communication, Cochin
- Third World Network , New Delhi
- Tirunelveli District Fisher People Coordination Committee
- Trust for Environmental Education
- United Artists Association (UAA), Orissa
- United Evangelical Mission, Kallor, Nagapattinam, TN
- Uvi Bdayu , Bandhugaon, Koraput, Orissa
- Vasundhara, Orissa
- Vettiver Collective, Chennai
- Vimochana, Bangalore
- Visthar, Bangalore
- Visual Search, Bangalore
- WaterWatch Alliance, New Delhi
- Yakshi, Hyderabad
- YMCA, Bangalore.
- Zailaitmu, Tumdibandh, Kotagarh, Kandhamal, , Orissa
MEDIA RELEASE: 2 July 2009, New Delhi
*****
ENVIRONMENT MINISTER URGED TO RECONSIDER DILUTION OF COASTAL LAWS
*****New Delhi: At a time when Minister Jairam Ramesh is settling into his new Environment portfolio with some unease, over 200 groups from across the country have issued an open letter demanding that his backdoor attempts to bring in a ‘hybrid’ set of de-regulatory rules for India’s coastal areas be dropped.
The groups have warned that the revision of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) guidelines into a Coastal Management Zone (CMZ) would open the floodgates for industrial estates, power plants, ports, harbours and tourism projects. The letter further warns that such re-working of coastal rules to accommodate the interests of big business will endanger both the coasts and the lives of 250 million coastal dwellers, including 10 million fisher people.
The CMZ notification is the result of recommendations of the MS Swaminathan Committee set up (in July 2004) with the mandate to suggest an appropriate framework for coastal management. Added to Swaminathan’s evident lack of knowledge on coastal issues, the committee came under fire for its undemocratic style of functioning and soliciting inputs from technocratic and investment lobbies. Community groups and environmental organisations alleged that they were completely bypassed.
Responding to these concerns a recent report (June 2009) by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science, Technology, Environment and Forests recommended that the CMZ 2008 Notification be kept in abeyance. The Parliamentary Panel criticized the Government’s attempt to bring this new coastal legislation through an undemocratic and non-participatory process. It urged the Government to ensure the ‘inclusion and integration of coastal communities through participative, decision making and control instruments’.
Minister Ramesh’s haste in easing coastal norms also flies in the face of his recent pronouncements on what his ministry is doing to combat climate change. In a recent interview1 he stated that ecological security is of paramount importance and climate change needs to be tackled from a local development perspective.
‘For coastal communities, the CMZ would hasten destructive climate change as it would facilitate massive investment with little environmental safeguards’, said T Peter from the Kerala Independent Fishworkers Federation, the group that initiated the open letter. ‘If Minister Ramesh is serious about dealing with climate change, he should drop the CMZ scheme and instead begin a dialogue with coastal communities’ added Peter. (Ends)


(8 votes, average: 4.13 out of 5)
July 10th, 2009 at 5:10 PM
You are making a mistake by saying that people are saying that CRZ is needed. Have you not seen the big agitations by the fishing community in Goa against CRZ? 8000 fishermen s houses are about to be demolished because of CRZ. People like mr Peter from the so called fishermens union are only in this for money. How can any logical person expect the fishermen to live more than half a km from the sea? Also- where there are already existing houses of fishermen – we are not allowed to expand our house even one inch (please read CRZ before making stupid comments). Does that mean me and my brothers (and our wives and children) should live in our 2 roomed fathers house? What are you talking about? Please give these issues due thought. Too many times our voice (the fisherman) has been hijacked by groups with vested interests and the only persons who suffer is us. Luckily in Goa- some of us fishermen are educated and do not need journalists and NGOs to speak on our behalf.
July 12th, 2009 at 9:53 AM
Dear Mr. Fernandes,
CRZ 1991 is the only notification so far which respects the customary rights of the fishing community over coastal land. It means that the fishing community has a traditional right to live in the coastal land and involve in their livelihood activities using the coastal land. It is the same as the customary right of the adivasis over forests. Several dilutions have taken place diluting this notification has been pushed due to commercial interests since 1991. Unfortunately, our national lobbies pretending to be the spokespersons of the fishing community did not do much about it, even though there were sporadic resistances in different quarters. At the moment, the same commercial lobbies as well as the World Bank with Dr. M.S. Swaminathan as their representation is pushing for a new notification, which would remove the customary rights altogether. The central idea is to facilitate the take-over of the coastal land for the activities of mining, tourism and hazardous industries.
The CRZ 91 may not be the perfect one, but that is the only hope for the fishing community today. You can use the same CRZ 91 to fight against demolitions if the house belonged to the fishing community. What the government has been trying to do so far was to remove the fishing community and be blind to the thousands of CRZ violations of the commercial interests. This has to be fought.
July 22nd, 2009 at 4:34 PM
i have land in crz3, i want to build house, no govt can stop me
October 27th, 2009 at 12:09 PM
we the owners of the land, do not have any rights as to whether we can build or not. who are these so called NGO’S that decide that we should build or not. We the owners should be able to build on our land.