Logo Design: vbhattathiri at gmail dot com

Join

You May Contemplate, Complicate, Create, Ponder, Muse, Confuse, Provoke, Evoke…

You May Fish Or Become Fish Or Water Or Pond….

(To Tell The Truth We Dont Give A Damn)
:-)

Send a mail to v@thefishpond.in
Anivar Aravind

Statement: Oppose backdoor changes to coastal regulation norms!

Updated: 2st July 2009 with Media Release and List of signatories

As you might be aware, the ten-month period that the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) had given itself to vet public comments received on the Draft Coastal Management Zone (CMZ) 2008 Notification comes to an end in June. This Draft, based on the recommendations of the much-criticized Swaminathan Committee Report, was an attempt to dismantle existing coastal regulation and open up coastal regions for fast-paced, destructive economic development. It was opposed not only by coastal communities, environmental groups, women’s organizations, trade unions, NGOs but also by several coastal state governments. The most recent caution against introducing such a coastal management regime came in March 2009 from a high-powered Parliamentary Standing Committee. The Minister, Jairam Ramesh has announced that on July 16 a fresh ‘hybrid’ rule will be issued that will combine existing rules with the recommendations of the Swaminathan Committee Report. A statement to this effect is given below which we urge you to endorse. Send your Organisational endorsements to peter.ksmtf@gmail.com within 20th June

Save the Coasts!! Oppose backdoor changes to coastal regulation norms!

We, the undersigned, strongly oppose the planned move of the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), as recently reported in the press, to introduce by July 16, a new, ‘hybrid’ set of coastal regulatory rules which will combine existing regulation and new rules based on the recommendations of the Swaminathan Committee. This is completely unacceptable and we are outraged by what appears to be a brazen attempt by the MoEF to introduce through the backdoor, pro-industry and anti-people coastal reforms that are being bitterly opposed by fishing and other coastal communities, environmental organizations, women’s organizations, trade unions and NGOs.

The report of the Swaminathan Committee had recommended that existing coastal regulation be dismantled and the coasts opened up to allow a wide range of economic activities; that ‘no-development zone’ restrictions be lifted in sensitive core areas and that the coastal zone be extended up to 12 nautical miles into the sea to make way for Notified Tourism Areas, Special Economic Zones, mining projects, industrial estates, power plants, ports and harbours. The report was rejected by the people who saw it as facilitating the illegal takeover of coastal land from the poor. It was an attempt to clear the path for unchecked coastal commercialization that did not hesitate to put 10 million fisher people in harm’s way; to destroy fragile and life-sustaining coastal ecosystems, and to significantly increase the potential for global warming and climate change through opening up coastal land for grabs.

The irresponsible and scheming recommendations subsequently formed the basis of a Draft Coastal Management Zone (CMZ) 2008 Notification to which objections were invited in May 2008. Several coastal state governments opposed the draft. It was opposed by fishing communities, environmental organizations, women’s organizations, trade unions and NGOs in every coastal state. The recent report submitted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science, Technology, Environment and Forests clearly recommends that the CMZ 2008 Notification be kept in abeyance. The Parliamentary Panel criticized the Government’s attempt to bring new coastal legislation through an undemocratic and non-participatory process. It has urged the Government to ensure the “inclusion and integration of coastal communities through participative, decision making and control instruments”.

The MoEF statement however indicates that while the CMZ 2008 Notification will be kept pending, the existing 1991 Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification to be issued on July 16 will now include the highly objectionable Swaminathan Committee recommendations. This is nothing but bringing the CMZ Notification through the backdoor! Was the public engagement on the issue no more than mere eyewash to manage dissent? We strongly condemn this underhand move of the newly formed UPA Government!

Reworking coastal rules to accommodate neo-liberal policies will endanger both the coasts and the lives of 250 million coastal dwellers, including 10 million fisher people. Fisher women, whose main activities are shoreline-based, are already suffering due to violations of existing norms which have allowed exploitative economic activities, like mining, tourism and hazardous industries to mushroom in coastal areas. Fisher women are aware that if coastal policy is amended to legitimize full-scale liberalization, they will have to bear the brunt of the resulting livelihood insecurity, coastal erosion, unavailability of basic services, cultural disintegration as well as increased sexual exploitation.

No change to coastal legislation can take place without proper consultations with fishing populations, including women; complete consensus from all coastal states; proper parliamentary discussion and national debate. We therefore reiterate that the only way forward is to:

1. Scrap any moves towards introducing the CMZ 2008 Notification
2. Reject the Swaminathan Committee report recommendations
3. Implement the 1991 CRZ Notification in its original form
4. Immediately identify and punish violations of the original 1991 CRZ Notification
5. Immediately recognize and uphold the traditional and customary rights of fisher people to housing, coastal lands as well as sea and marine resources.

Endorsed by

  1. Aastha Sansthan, Udaipur
  2. Adishakti Lokbikash Sangthan, Patrapur, Gajpati, Orissa
  3. Adivasi Adhikar Abhijan Mayurbhanj, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
  4. Adivasi Banvasi Kalyan Samiti, Sonbhadra
  5. Adivasi Bikash Parisad, Kaptipada, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
  6. Adivasi Chetona Manch, Kalahandi, Orissa
  7. Adivasi Dalit Adhikar Abhijan Manch, Pallahara, Anugul, Orissa
  8. Adivasi Jan Van Adhikar Manch, Chattisgarh
  9. Adivasi Solidarity Council (South India), Tamil Nadu
  10. Adiwasi Samta Manch Kankwe-East, Bastar
  11. Alter Media, Trichur
  12. Anchalik Bikash Parisad, Anugul, Orissa
  13. Anchalik Jungle Surakshya Sangthan, Rasgovindpur, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
  14. Anchalika Adivasi Unnayan Parishad, Hindol, Dhenkanal, Orissa
  15. Ancholia Unnayan Parishad, Phiringia, Kandhamal, Orissa
  16. Ancholiko Unnayan Sangh, Dasmonthpur, Koraput, Orissa
  17. Ancholiko Vikas Parisad, Pottangi, Koraput, Orissa
  18. ANHAD ( Act Now for Harmony and Democracy), New Delhi
  19. Anthra, Hyderabad and Pune
  20. Antyodaya Chetana Mandal (ACM), Orissa
  21. Apda Nivarak Manch Jalaun
  22. B.K.S. Moodigeri Karnataka
  23. Bada Emam Bada, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh
  24. Badlav Sansthan, Udaipur
  25. BAGHICHA
  26. Balmianni Kutomi, Umarkote, Nawarangpur, Orissa
  27. Basel Mission Christian Association, Bangalore,
  28. Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Purush Sangharsh Morcha, Bhopal
  29. Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Stationery Karmchari Sangh, Bhopal
  30. Bhopal Group for Information & Action
  31. binayaksen.net
  32. Breakthrough Appropriate Technology Transfer Network (BATNET), Orissa
  33. Budakattu Krishikara Sangha (B.K.S.) Karnataka
  34. Center for Social Initiatives, Gorakhpur
  35. Centre for Education and Documentation
  36. Centre for Organisation Research & Education (CORE), Imphal, Manipur 
  37. Centre for Research on New International Economic Order (CReNIEO), Tamilnadu and Orissa
  38. Chetana Sansthan,  Rajgarh,Alwar
  39. CIEDS Collective, Bengaluru
  40. Coastal community development  society
  41. Coastal development Forum- Alappuzha
  42. Coastal Women’s Movement
  43. Community Environmental Monitoring, Chennai
  44. Coorg Organisation For Rural Development (CORD)
  45. Corporate Accountability Desk of The Other Media, Chennai
  46. Council of Professional Social Workers (CPSW), Orissa
  47. Dabco, Madhya Pradesh
  48. DEED, Hunsur
  49. Delhi Forum
  50. Deo-mali Mahila Sangh, Semiliguda, Koraput, Orissa
  51. Dialogue from the Other End, Chattisgarh
  52. Disha Samaj Sevi Sanstha, Chattisgarh
  53. East Coast Research and Development, Thoothukudi, Tamil nadu
  54. Electro – Homeopathy Medical Association of India, Allahabad
  55. Environment Support Group, Bangalore
  56. Equations, Bangalore
  57. Focus on Global South, India
  58. Forum Against Oppression of Women, Mumbai.
  59. Forum Kerala
  60. Foundation for Nature Exploration and Environmental Conservation, Bangalore
  61. Free Binayak Sen Campaign
  62. FRIENDS, Varanasi
  63. Gana Chetana Sangthan, Rasgovindpur, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
  64. Ganglamaa Vikash Manch, Korkunda, Malkangiri, Orissa
  65. Gas Peedit Mahila Purush Sangharsh
  66. Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Andolan(Mumbai)
  67. Gram Sahajog, Kalahandi, Orissa
  68. Gram Vikas (GV), Orissa
  69. Gramanchal Bikash Parisad, Anugul, Keonjhar, Orissa
  70. Green Alternatives
  71. Greenpeace India
  72. Greenpeace, India
  73. Himal Watch, Uttarakhand
  74. Ho Munda Bhasa Bikash Manch, Kaptipada, Mayurbhanj, Orissa
  75. IDSL, Begumganj, Madhya Pradesh
  76. Indian Social Action Forum – INSAF, Delhi
  77. Indian Social Institute, New Delhi
  78. INSAF, New Delhi
  79. Integrated Rural Development of Weaker Sections in India (IRDWSI), Orissa
  80. Intercultural Resources, Delhi
  81. International Collective for the support of Fishworkers, Chennai
  82. International Institute of Art, Culture & Democracy, Bangalore
  83. Jagran Jan vikas , Udaipur, Rajasthan.
  84. Jahar Surkshya Manch, Rasgovindpur, Kaptipada, Orissa
  85. JAN CHETANA, Raigarh, Chhathisgarh
  86. Jenamunnettom-Kerala
  87. Jharkhnd Jengal Bechavo Antholan
  88. Jungle Jivan Surakshya Parisad, Umarkote, Nawarangpur, Orissa
  89. KABANI The Other Direction, Kerala
  90. Kalpavriksh
  91. Kancheepuram District Fisher People Rights Movement
  92. Karnataka Social Forum, Bangaluru
  93. Kasti Dakua Adivasi Mohasangha, Nuagaon, Nayagarh, Orissa
  94. Kenneth Anderson Nature Society
  95. Kerala Swatantra Malsya Thozhilaly Federation (KSMTF)
  96. Kerala Theeradesa Mahilavedi
  97. Kerala Tourism Watch
  98. Keraleeyam Magazine, Trichur
  99. Kheti Virasat Mission, Punjab.
  100. Kindernothilfe, Bangalore
  101. Kisan Morcha, Bikaner
  102. Kuvi Kulomi, Semiliguda, Koraput, Orissa
  103. LABIA/ Stree Sangam, Mumbai
  104. Loko Unnayan Sangh (LUS), Semiliguda, Koraput, Orissa
  105. Madhuban Sewa Samiti, Fatehpur
  106. Madurai Multipurpose Social Service Society, Madurai
  107. Mahendragiri Adivasi Adhikar Samiti, Rayagada, Gajpati, Orissa
  108. Mahila Evam Bal Kalyan Sewa Samiti, Deoria
  109. Malabar Theeradesa Mahila Federation
  110. Malaygiri Bikash Manch, Anugul, Keonjhar, , Orissa
  111. Malwarmir, Indore
  112. Maru Women SHG federation, Bikaner
  113. Meenava Viduthalai Vengaiakal
  114. Mewat Community Foundation, Alwar
  115. Mewat Vikas Shiksha Samiti, Rajasthan
  116. MMSVS, Alwar
  117. Moving Republic, Bangalore
  118. Mukti Sanghthan, Dhenkanal, Orissa
  119. Munigiri Gana Sangthan, Rayagada, Gajpati, Orissa
  120. Nagarik Mancha, West Bengal
  121. Nagrik Kalyan Samity, Jharkhnd
  122. Nari Bikash-Women Organisation, Lanjigarh, Kalahandi, Orissa
  123. Narmada Bachao Andolan
  124. National Adivasi Alliance
  125. National Campaign for Dalit Human Rights
  126. National Coastal Women’s Movement
  127. National Forum of Forest People and Forest Workers
  128. National Society of Friends of the Trees, Pune
  129. National Union of Fishermen
  130. New Socialist Alternative
  131. New Trade Union Initiative
  132. Niyamgiri Surkshya Manch, Kalahandi, Orissa
  133. Odisha Adivasi Adhikar Abhijan, Orissa
  134. Open Space & SUPPORT, Bangalore
  135. Openspace, Bangalore
  136. PAD Vambar Tamilnadu
  137. Pahadi Sangrami Manch, Kandhamal, Orissa
  138. Paryavaran Mitra, Ahmedabad
  139. Pathabhedam Magazine, Calicut
  140. PEACE, New Delhi
  141. People’s Rural Education Movement (PREM), Orissa
  142. People’s Institute for Participatory Action Research (PIPAR), Orissa
  143. Peoples Movement against Nuclear Energy, Tamil nadu
  144. Pondichery State Fishworkers forum
  145. Praktik Paryavaran Sarvardhan Samiti, Jaipur
  146. Presentation Sisters Lismore, Australia
  147. Project level committee, Rayagada, Gajpati, Orissa
  148. PUCL, Balia
  149. Regional Centre for Development Cooperation (RCDC), Orissa
  150. RIGHTS Kerala
  151. River Basin Friends, Assam
  152. Rural Action for Development (RAD), Orissa
  153. Rusimal Anchalik Unnayan Parishad, Daringbadi, Kondhmal, Orissa
  154. Sahaya, Kandhamal, Orissa
  155. Saheli, New Delhi
  156. SAIACS, CED Centre, Bangalore
  157. Sajukodi Dhorti Surkhya Porisod, Semiliguda, Koraput, , Orissa
  158. Samajika Parivartana Vikas Kendra (SPVK), Orissa
  159. Samajika Vikas Kendram (SVK), Orissa
  160. Samruddhi Kanakapura Karnataka.
  161. Samudayik Vikas Sansthan, Barabanki
  162. Sanmathi, Bangalore
  163. Sarvangeen Gramin Vikas Prashikshan Samiti, Mubarakpur, Gazipur
  164. Saura Adivasi Ahikar Abhijan, Nuagada, Gajpati, Orissa
  165. Seba Jagat Orissa
  166. SEBAJAGAT (Orissa)
  167. Seva Bharati (SB), Orissa
  168. Shakti Sangthan (The women member’s organisation), Dhenkanal, Orissa
  169. Shremasakthi  Job Training &Research Centre, Trivandrum
  170. Social Action Group for Achievement of Right (SAGAR), Jaunpur
  171. Social Scientist, Hyderabad
  172. Social Work Department, St. Joseph’s College, Bangalore
  173. Society for Leprosy Amelioration and Rehabilitation (SOLAR), Orissa
  174. Socio-Economic Development Programme (SEDP), Orissa and WB
  175. Solidarity Youth Movement- Kerala
  176. South Asian Dialogues on Ecological Democracy ( SADED)
  177. South Indian Cell for Human Rights Education & Monitoring (SICHREM)
  178. South India Fisher People Welfare Society
  179. Tagore Society for Rural Development (TSRD), Orissa and WB
  180. Tamilnadu Coastal Protection Movement
  181. Tamil Nadu Environment Council (TNEC)
  182. Tamilnadu Fisher People Development Society
  183. Tamilnadu Pondy Fisher people Federation
  184. TEED Trust Yellapur Karnataka
  185. Third Eye Communication, Cochin
  186. Third World Network , New Delhi
  187. Tirunelveli District Fisher People Coordination Committee
  188. Trust for Environmental Education
  189. United Artists Association (UAA), Orissa
  190. United Evangelical Mission, Kallor, Nagapattinam, TN
  191. Uvi Bdayu , Bandhugaon, Koraput, Orissa
  192. Vasundhara, Orissa
  193. Vettiver Collective, Chennai
  194. Vimochana, Bangalore
  195. Visthar, Bangalore
  196. Visual Search, Bangalore
  197. WaterWatch Alliance, New Delhi
  198. Yakshi, Hyderabad
  199. YMCA, Bangalore.
  200. Zailaitmu, Tumdibandh, Kotagarh, Kandhamal, , Orissa

MEDIA RELEASE: 2 July 2009, New Delhi

*****
ENVIRONMENT MINISTER URGED TO RECONSIDER DILUTION OF COASTAL LAWS
*****

New Delhi: At a time when Minister Jairam Ramesh is settling into his new Environment portfolio with some unease, over 200 groups from across the country have issued an open letter demanding that his backdoor attempts to bring in a ‘hybrid’ set of de-regulatory rules for India’s coastal areas be dropped.

The groups have warned that the revision of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) guidelines into a Coastal Management Zone (CMZ) would open the floodgates for industrial estates, power plants, ports, harbours and tourism projects. The letter further warns that such re-working of coastal rules to accommodate the interests of big business will endanger both the coasts and the lives of 250 million coastal dwellers, including 10 million fisher people.

The CMZ notification is the result of recommendations of the MS Swaminathan Committee set up (in July 2004) with the mandate to suggest an appropriate framework for coastal management. Added to Swaminathan’s evident lack of knowledge on coastal issues, the committee came under fire for its undemocratic style of functioning and soliciting inputs from technocratic and investment lobbies. Community groups and environmental organisations alleged that they were completely bypassed.

Responding to these concerns a recent report (June 2009) by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science, Technology, Environment and Forests recommended that the CMZ 2008 Notification be kept in abeyance. The Parliamentary Panel criticized the Government’s attempt to bring this new coastal legislation through an undemocratic and non-participatory process. It urged the Government to ensure the ‘inclusion and integration of coastal communities through participative, decision making and control instruments’.

Minister Ramesh’s haste in easing coastal norms also flies in the face of his recent pronouncements on what his ministry is doing to combat climate change. In a recent interview1 he stated that ecological security is of paramount importance and climate change needs to be tackled from a local development perspective.

‘For coastal communities, the CMZ would hasten destructive climate change as it would facilitate massive investment with little environmental safeguards’, said T Peter from the Kerala Independent Fishworkers Federation, the group that initiated the open letter. ‘If Minister Ramesh is serious about dealing with climate change, he should drop the CMZ scheme and instead begin a dialogue with coastal communities’ added Peter. (Ends)

4 comments to Statement: Oppose backdoor changes to coastal regulation norms!

  1. john fernandes
    July 10th, 2009 at 5:10 PM

    You are making a mistake by saying that people are saying that CRZ is needed. Have you not seen the big agitations by the fishing community in Goa against CRZ? 8000 fishermen s houses are about to be demolished because of CRZ. People like mr Peter from the so called fishermens union are only in this for money. How can any logical person expect the fishermen to live more than half a km from the sea? Also- where there are already existing houses of fishermen – we are not allowed to expand our house even one inch (please read CRZ before making stupid comments). Does that mean me and my brothers (and our wives and children) should live in our 2 roomed fathers house? What are you talking about? Please give these issues due thought. Too many times our voice (the fisherman) has been hijacked by groups with vested interests and the only persons who suffer is us. Luckily in Goa- some of us fishermen are educated and do not need journalists and NGOs to speak on our behalf.

  2. Anivar Aravind
    July 12th, 2009 at 9:53 AM

    Dear Mr. Fernandes,

    CRZ 1991 is the only notification so far which respects the customary rights of the fishing community over coastal land. It means that the fishing community has a traditional right to live in the coastal land and involve in their livelihood activities using the coastal land. It is the same as the customary right of the adivasis over forests. Several dilutions have taken place diluting this notification has been pushed due to commercial interests since 1991. Unfortunately, our national lobbies pretending to be the spokespersons of the fishing community did not do much about it, even though there were sporadic resistances in different quarters. At the moment, the same commercial lobbies as well as the World Bank with Dr. M.S. Swaminathan as their representation is pushing for a new notification, which would remove the customary rights altogether. The central idea is to facilitate the take-over of the coastal land for the activities of mining, tourism and hazardous industries.

    The CRZ 91 may not be the perfect one, but that is the only hope for the fishing community today. You can use the same CRZ 91 to fight against demolitions if the house belonged to the fishing community. What the government has been trying to do so far was to remove the fishing community and be blind to the thousands of CRZ violations of the commercial interests. This has to be fought.

  3. john
    July 22nd, 2009 at 4:34 PM

    i have land in crz3, i want to build house, no govt can stop me

  4. Mary
    October 27th, 2009 at 12:09 PM

    we the owners of the land, do not have any rights as to whether we can build or not. who are these so called NGO’S that decide that we should build or not. We the owners should be able to build on our land.