<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPM, CBI, CIA AND OTHER DEMONS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons</link>
	<description>placid, never!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: indulekha</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>indulekha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-106</guid>
		<description>paangundenkil 2000 okke vaangi adichal pore mone,alla,man-ee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paangundenkil 2000 okke vaangi adichal pore mone,alla,man-ee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malluman</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>malluman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Correction &quot;mallu men are intellectually superior to mallu women&quot;. Spellcheck impacted by Haywards 2000, another macho icon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction &#8220;mallu men are intellectually superior to mallu women&#8221;. Spellcheck impacted by Haywards 2000, another macho icon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malluman</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>malluman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-104</guid>
		<description>men across the globe are physically superior to women, mallu men are intellectually superior to mallu men. If mallu women want their voice to be heard, they need to emulate the intellegent mallu men. Bury your manasaputhris, line up for kiarostami. If Marquez&#039; language is a challenge, go for Methil and Anand.

Else educated mallu woman will grow up to just another &#039;Goddess of Silly Things&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>men across the globe are physically superior to women, mallu men are intellectually superior to mallu men. If mallu women want their voice to be heard, they need to emulate the intellegent mallu men. Bury your manasaputhris, line up for kiarostami. If Marquez&#8217; language is a challenge, go for Methil and Anand.</p>
<p>Else educated mallu woman will grow up to just another &#8216;Goddess of Silly Things&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sudeep</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>sudeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-102</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&#039;a female loses her feminity when she publishes her opinions to the world..&#039;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That happens because the current defined ways of speaking in public are certainly male. A woman is forced to talk the same language. And most people who listen are men again. (Take the reader&#039;s mail section in Mathrubhumi Azhchappathipp for example).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This can change if one tries to speak a language of one&#039;s own -- language of women, so to speak. And when they start speaking to women (in public, not just in the kitchen) and claim legitimacy to that language. (It will be often dismissed by the &#039;mallu men&#039; as silly, so it can surely not happen overnight).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see some efforts towards that in Sreejitha&#039;s post &#039;Call for co-authors&#039;. And even in this post by Srividya. (Though not so much in the other post of hers).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I think &lt;i&gt;&#039;Does it have to stay that way&#039;&lt;/i&gt; is still relevant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I had a dream.. of a Malayalam magazine run by women and of women, and mainly &#039;for women&#039; also. Men can be part of it as long as they stut their mouths and are willing to listen to women&#039;s language. Yes, there are issues like all women don&#039;t speak the same language, there is caste and other things.. but with all that problems, I think it will still be worth it. Something that would sell at least the quantities of Malayala Manorama Azhchappathipp.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#39;a female loses her feminity when she publishes her opinions to the world..&#39;</i></p>
<p>That happens because the current defined ways of speaking in public are certainly male. A woman is forced to talk the same language. And most people who listen are men again. (Take the reader&#39;s mail section in Mathrubhumi Azhchappathipp for example).</p>
<p>This can change if one tries to speak a language of one&#39;s own &#8212; language of women, so to speak. And when they start speaking to women (in public, not just in the kitchen) and claim legitimacy to that language. (It will be often dismissed by the &#39;mallu men&#39; as silly, so it can surely not happen overnight).</p>
<p>I see some efforts towards that in Sreejitha&#39;s post &#39;Call for co-authors&#39;. And even in this post by Srividya. (Though not so much in the other post of hers).</p>
<p>So I think <i>&#39;Does it have to stay that way&#39;</i> is still relevant.</p>
<p>(I had a dream.. of a Malayalam magazine run by women and of women, and mainly &#39;for women&#39; also. Men can be part of it as long as they stut their mouths and are willing to listen to women&#39;s language. Yes, there are issues like all women don&#39;t speak the same language, there is caste and other things.. but with all that problems, I think it will still be worth it. Something that would sell at least the quantities of Malayala Manorama Azhchappathipp.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malluman</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>malluman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-101</guid>
		<description>guys, (&amp; gals for the sake of inclusion, not sure if there is any around). It is just that a female loses her feminity when she publishes her opinions to the world. Public expression of oneself is a right for men alone. Arundhati uncle learnt it the hard way. If you are not my &#039;kind&#039;, you aren&#039;t a mallu. And then &#039;does it have to stay like that&#039; loses its relevance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guys, (&#038; gals for the sake of inclusion, not sure if there is any around). It is just that a female loses her feminity when she publishes her opinions to the world. Public expression of oneself is a right for men alone. Arundhati uncle learnt it the hard way. If you are not my &#39;kind&#39;, you aren&#39;t a mallu. And then &#39;does it have to stay like that&#39; loses its relevance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanjeev</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjeev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-81</guid>
		<description>my response, obviously, was a take on the response of &quot;the mallu man&quot; and &#039;his&#039; kind.&lt;br&gt;hence no problem with condemning that demarcation to hell and beyond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my response, obviously, was a take on the response of &#8220;the mallu man&#8221; and &#39;his&#39; kind.<br />hence no problem with condemning that demarcation to hell and beyond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sudeep</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>sudeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Dear Sanjeev,&lt;br&gt;                                                                                                                                                             &lt;br&gt;&quot;Masculine, high-literature&quot; vs &quot;popular culture&quot; sounds too simplistic to me. I have two major issues with it.&lt;br&gt;                                                                                                                                                             &lt;br&gt;One, as Mythri pointed out, there are popular cultures that the &quot;mallu men&quot; proudly identify themselves with. Not just football -- even films are one popular culture that is majorly male. The stories are very male, so are the jokes, and so are the people who talk it in more visible pheres. Women are excluded from these discussions -- be it films or football.&lt;br&gt;                                                                                                                                                             &lt;br&gt;Two, by making this demarcation, we end up feeling good (making fun of the men who indulge in &quot;masculine/ high literature&quot; Marquez) and thus legitimize the exclusion of women from what they consider the &quot;serious&quot; spaces. I am not talking about academic spaces here -- there we can argue that women also have somewhat the same opportunities, despite descriminations. Look at our households, tea shops, barber shops, party offices, bars and other such places. Women would at most make tea for these men at a household, even today. They have their serials, yes, but does it have to stay like that?&lt;br&gt;                                                                                                                                                             &lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;Sudeep</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sanjeev,</p>
<p>&#8220;Masculine, high-literature&#8221; vs &#8220;popular culture&#8221; sounds too simplistic to me. I have two major issues with it.</p>
<p>One, as Mythri pointed out, there are popular cultures that the &#8220;mallu men&#8221; proudly identify themselves with. Not just football &#8212; even films are one popular culture that is majorly male. The stories are very male, so are the jokes, and so are the people who talk it in more visible pheres. Women are excluded from these discussions &#8212; be it films or football.</p>
<p>Two, by making this demarcation, we end up feeling good (making fun of the men who indulge in &#8220;masculine/ high literature&#8221; Marquez) and thus legitimize the exclusion of women from what they consider the &#8220;serious&#8221; spaces. I am not talking about academic spaces here &#8212; there we can argue that women also have somewhat the same opportunities, despite descriminations. Look at our households, tea shops, barber shops, party offices, bars and other such places. Women would at most make tea for these men at a household, even today. They have their serials, yes, but does it have to stay like that?</p>
<p>Regards<br />Sudeep</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanjeev</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjeev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Yes, but hope u have not forgotten the uproar when M T Ansari tried to problematise this craze and space in his reading of N S Madhavan’s “Higuita”:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but hope u have not forgotten the uproar when M T Ansari tried to problematise this craze and space in his reading of N S Madhavan’s “Higuita”:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythri</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>mythri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-67</guid>
		<description>you are right sanjeev. this frenzy is very mallu male with lots of hegemonic homosociality at play. Something which comes closer is the football craze in malabar, a popular culture marxists aren&#039;t ashamed to endorse, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right sanjeev. this frenzy is very mallu male with lots of hegemonic homosociality at play. Something which comes closer is the football craze in malabar, a popular culture marxists aren&#8217;t ashamed to endorse, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanjeev</title>
		<link>http://thefishpond.in/srividya/2009/cpm-cbi-cia-and-other-demons/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjeev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefishpond.in/?p=63#comment-64</guid>
		<description>damn right, mythri; but the response of &quot;mallu man&quot; shows &#039;his&#039; kind would eternally prefer mallus - men or women - who successfully transcend the [feminine/popular culture]Mills&amp;Boons and embrace [masculine/high literature]Marquez:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn right, mythri; but the response of &#8220;mallu man&#8221; shows &#8216;his&#8217; kind would eternally prefer mallus &#8211; men or women &#8211; who successfully transcend the [feminine/popular culture]Mills&amp;Boons and embrace [masculine/high literature]Marquez:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

